Taylor Ann Lawhead
Prof. Christopher Brown
English 1B
March 25, 2013
A Rhetorical Critique of “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by
Nicholas Carr
Every
day there is some new technological advancement making its way into the world
in an attempt to make life easier for people. In the article, “Is Google Making
Us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr explains his thoughts on how he believes the
internet is running the risk of making people full of artificial knowledge.
Carr begins by explaining how he feels that the web is causing his focus
issues, how he can no longer be completely immersed in a book, and is the
reason why he gets fidgety while reading. He then goes on to talk about how his
life is surrounded by the internet and how that is the blame for the issues he
has towards not being able to stay connected to a text and how it has changed
the way that people deep read . In an attempt to draw the reader in, Carr uses
a great deal of rhetorical appeals. He compares the differences of the past and
the present, such as advances in technology and the way people read, and how he
feels how it has changed not only himself, but others as well and how they
aren’t able to comprehend and focus due to the growing nature of the web. While
comparing these differences and explaning his views of the web, he accumulated
research from several credited writers who feel the same way he does about the
effects of the web. Carr uses personal experience, vivid imagery, and analysis
backed by research to hook the viewer in and persuade them that in today’s
society, the internet is causing mainly problems.
Although
Carr has his own personal experiences with the negative effects of the web, he
also did his research on how other writers had agreed with him on the subject
to help support his strategies of logos. The use of the evidence from the other
writers helps to draw in the reader and show them the effects of the internet
with the help of reputable resources. In the article, he states that one of the
articles he gained information from had said, “It is clear that users are not
reading online in the traditional sense”; that the way we read now is what you
would call ‘skimming’ or reading “horizontally through titles, contents pages
and abstracts going for quick wins” (Carr). With reading on the web, people
don’t read the entire article and it is seen that they bounce from page to
page, losing focus quickly. Carr uses this information because the reader can
relate to it, like himself. This information that gathered helps his article
because it is not in conflict with what he had stated due to the fact that him
and the authors that he gained information from, had the same thoughts that he
did about the situation. In his article, Carr uses more than one source to back
up his argument about the web.
Another example of logos that Carr uses is
when a writer, Maryanne Wolf, describes how due to text messaging and cell
phones we are experiencing a different type of reading today than in the 1960’s
and 70’s; a type of reading that “may be weakening our capacity for deep
reading” (Carr). This is useful in the sense that it is evidence is aimed
towards a younger age, due to how he talks about text messaging and cell
phones, and therefore can pull in a different audience. This example, while
still logos due to it based on evidence and facts, can also be considered ethos
in a sense that he is trying to ‘build a bridge’ in a connection with his
audience. Although this seems like a strong strategy to relate to a different
age based audience, it could also conflict with others, such as a newer
generation that believes that the internet is not harming the mind. In another
part of the article he contradicts himself by using the information from James
Olds, a professor of neuroscience, when he states that the human mind is very
malleable and has the ability to reprogram itself. When using this information,
its conflicts with the statement from Wolf about the reading of texts weakening
the mind. Although he uses facts from reputable sources to show that he is
knowledgeable about the subject, due to the contradicting information it can
cause the reader to question whether or not he knows where he is going with the
topic.
While
using the strategy of facts and evidence can be effective, Carr also uses vivid
imagery and detailed wording to reel the reader in. The author uses the
strategy of pathos to make the reader interpret his views the way that he sees
them himself. An example of this would be when he talks about the way he loses
focus in a text and that he feels he is “dragging his wayward brain back” to
whatever he was reading (Carr). Carr uses this metaphor, giving an action to an
object, to show the reader exactly the difficulty he has staying focused on a
reading and how he has to almost ‘physically’ bring his mind back to the text.
Another example of this strategy of pathos would be how he says that he “once
was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now [he] zip(s) along the surface like a
guy on a Jet Ski” (Carr). He attempts to
pull the reader in by using this vivid imagery to show how he used to be fully
immersed in a book but now due to the Net, he just skims the readings and
doesn’t get to see what is below the surface. The use of the imagery and the
figurative language can be very effective due to that it can pull in every age
of audience because it appeals to a person’s imagination. Because the appeal to
the readers’ imagination is so broad, it can help his argument, due to the fact
that it is able to work on every age; thus being able to have more people on
his side. I believe that the use of
pathos, when done correctly, can be very moving and persuasive. Carr used the
right language to pull the reader in and to show how he was feeling without
being too over the top, and was able to persuade his reader to the effects of
the web in today’s society.
In
Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, he uses the rhetorical
strategies to try to persuade his audience into believing that due to the Web
being used so much in today’s society, that it is causing more harm than good.
He uses backed up information to get his point across while also showing his
character to connect with the audience. Carr also uses the strategy of pathos
to appeal to the readers imagination to pull them in to show what he
experienced. I feel that although I may not agree with everything he is
stating, the things he used were persuasive enough to keep the reader reading,
and some agreeing with him that the internet is causing more harm to the human
mind.